https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/05/11/the-rule-of-lawyers-the-labour-party-is-eager
-to-resume-its-war-on-the-white-working-class/

THE RULE OF LAWYERS: THE LABOUR PARTY IS EAGER TO RESUME WAR ON THE WHITE
WORKING-CLASS

“A lawyer is the larval stage of a politician.” It’s a good line, but whose is
it? I’ve seen it attributed to Ambrose Bierce, but I can’t confirm that. Whoever
came up with it, he wouldn’t have won the approval of the late, great Jewish
writer Larry Auster.  We shouldn’t liken human beings to animals and other lower
life-forms.  That’s what Auster thought.

I can see his point, but do lawyers and politicians count as human beings?
Well, yes, of course they do. But they don’t count as normal human beings.
Psychopathy and narcissism are more common among lawyers, for example.  This is
what that acute and astute observer Charles Dickens says of the lawyer Mr Kenge
in his novel Bleak House (1853): “He appeared to enjoy beyond everything the
sound of his own voice.” What Dickens observed in the nineteenth century is
still true well over a hundred years later. Here’s an anecdote by the Jewish
journalist John Podhoretz about the lawyer- politician Joe Biden, currently the
senile pseudo-president of the United States: A quarter-century ago [i.e., circa
1985], Sen. Joseph R. Biden of Delaware, then in his third term, came in for a
lunch with a few editors and reporters at the newspaper where I worked. Its
editor welcomed Biden and asked him a question about whatever story was at the
top of the news agenda that day.  Biden started talking. And talking.  And
talking. He spoke and he gesticulated. He wandered off into secondary subjects,
and secondary subjects of the secondary subjects.  He conjured up a memory of
his childhood, and then told a tale from his first campaign.  After 20 minutes
without so much as a breath, it was clear to me and others around the table that
there was something wrong — that our guest simply did not know how to conclude
his peroration.  We shifted in our chairs. Someone coughed. Someone else sighed.
The door loomed behind us, tormenting us with the blessings of an escape we
simply could not make.

It was not until 45 minutes after he had begun that Joseph I. Biden simply ran
out of gas.  He came to no conclusion, no closing thought.  He just stopped
talking, looked down, and at last took a bite of food and drank some water.

I had never been through anything like it. Biden had displayed a literally
clinical display of logorrhea, a term Google defines for me as “pathologically
incoherent, repetitive speech.” (“The incredible lightness of Biden,” New York
Post, 19th August 2012) Like Dickens’ Mr Kenge, Biden “enjoys beyond everything
the sound of his own voice.” Biden also follows Kenge in casting a blight over
those he’s supposed to serve and protect.  Bleak House is aptly named and
Dickens rightly identifies lawyers as highly corruptible and hugely malignant.

As lawyers, so politicians: what allows someone to succeed in law translates
perfectly to success in politics. Or in Western politics, at least. Ron Unz has
contrasted the engineer-politicians of China with the lawyer-politicians of the
West. The contrast is entirely in favor of China. Engineering and law inculcate
quite different habits of mind in those who practise them.  Engineers succeed or
fail by manipulating matter; lawyers succeed or fail by manipulating words.
Engineers rely on mathematics; lawyers rely on Machiavellianism. To see the
contrast at its starkest, just compare the highly intelligent and capable
Chinese engineer-president Xi Jinping (born 1953) with the devious and
disaster-sowing Western lawyer-politicians Barack Obama and Tony Blair.

Gentile law-pol Tony Blair performs the goy-grovel overseen by Jewish law-pol
Greville Janner, an alleged child-rapist (image © PA Wire/Press Association
Images) But there’s another factor at work.  Chinese politicians aren’t selected
for their hostility to the native Chinese majority and to Chinese civilization.
That’s because Chinese politics isn’t funded and controlled by an alien group of
inveterate Sinophobes. That is, there is no equivalent of the Jews in China and
no equivalent of AIPAC

or Conservative Friends of Israel working behind the scenes. In the corrupt
Western sense, China isn’t a democracy; in another sense, it is much more of a
democracy than any of its critics in the West. That’s because the leaders of
China are drawn from the demos of China, the native Han Chinese, and work in the
best interests of the Han Chinese.  They’re not only engineers: they’re
autoethnophiles. They love their own people and would never open the borders of
China to mass migration by non-Chinese.

Labour hates White workers The West is entirely different. Jewish money and
Jewish priorities control politics everywhere from Britain and France to America
and Australia.  The lawyer-politicians of the West are selected for their
hostility to the rapidly dwindling White majority and to Christian civilization.
And despite all their high-flown lawyers’ rhetoric about “democracy” and the
“will of the people,” those law-pols refuse to allow the people any say
whatsoever about mass migration. The great White engineer and manufacturer Henry
Ford joked that his cars could be of “Any color the customer wants, as long as
it’s black.” Western politicians think that White voters can have any kind of
immigration policy they like, so long as it involves open borders for the
corrupt, criminally inclined and exotic-disease-bearing tax-eaters of the Third
World.

That’s because Western politicians follow a Jewish
agenda. And all of that — the evils of rule by lawyers and of Jewish control —
brings me neatly to the man who seems highly likely to be Britain’s next prime
minister. Sir Keir Starmer, leader of the Labour party, is a slippery lawyer
with a Jewish wife.  As you can tell from its name, Labour was founded in the
nineteenth century to champion the working-class. In those days, it went without
saying that the working-class was White. But Labour long ago betrayed its
founding principles and became the dedicated enemy of the White working-class.
The traitorous Roy Hattersley, former deputy leader of the Labour party, has
openly boasted of how he betrayed his White working-class constituents: How are
politicians to behave when, having listened, they find themselves in fundamental
disagreement with what they have heard? Should I, in 1964, have called for what
a clear majority of my constituents, and most of the country, undoubtedly wanted
— the repatriation of all Commonwealth [i.e., non-White] immigrants? [His
answer: “Not in a million years.”] (Politics should be guided by principles, not
populism, The Guardian, 5th May 2013)  For most of my 33 years in Westminster,
I was able to resist Sparkbrook’s demands about the great issues of national
policy — otherwise, my first decade would have been spent opposing all
Commonwealth immigration and my last calling for withdrawal from the European
Union. (Ideology’s our life, Esther, The Guardian, 31st July 2013)

Like Keir Starmer, Hattersley has a Jewish wife, the literary agent Maggie
Pearlstine. She is responsible for Hattersley’s great wealth just as other Jews
are responsible for Hattersley’s anti-White, pro-migrant ideology. Keir Starmer
will enjoy the same great wealth thanks to his embrace of the same ideology.
After the abominable aberrations of Jeremy Corbyn, who wasn’t interested in
money and refused to allow himself to be controlled by Jews, Starmer has
returned Labour to the paths of righteousness. Jewish money once again dictates
Labour’s policies and Labour’s priorities. Corbyn was no friend of the White
working-class, of course, but he wasn’t a friend of Israel either. He would have
opposed rather than supported the vicious Israeli war on Gaza. The so-called
Labour leader Starmer supports that war as slavishly as the so-called
Conservative leader Rishi Sunak does.

The Third-Worlding of Britain The geeky Indian Sunak and his party look set to
be heavily punished at the next election for their own betrayal of their
founding principles. Just as Labour hate the White working-class, the
Conservatives hate tradition and don’t conserve anything. Tory prime minister
David Cameron, who is partly Jewish and was wholly controlled by Jews, has
boasted that his one of his proudest achievement whilst in office was the
introduction of “same-sex marriage.” Cameron wasn’t able to achieve something
else, however. He promised to reduce migration and instead oversaw a massively
increase.  Each of his successors has done the same: promised to reduce
immigration and instead overseen a massive increase. The Tories have betrayed
White voters, so some of those voters will switch to Labour at the next
election. It will be a very stupid thing to do, because Labour will perform the
remarkable feat of being even more treacherous on migration than the Tories.
Under Starmer, the Third-Worlding of Britain will accelerate even more.  Geeky
trans-Western Rishi Sunak performs the goy-grovel at Conservative Friends of
Israel

That won’t just apply to a further increase in the already disastrously high
rates of immigration. Labour will pass more laws to privilege non- Whites and to
punish any White resistance to the invasion of their homeland. In other words,
Labour will resume the war on the White working- class that was interrupted when
Gordon Brown, the last Labour prime minister, was defeated by the not-at- all
Conservatives in 2010. Sir Keir Starmer, the slippery lawyer with a Jewish wife,
will be a perfect figurehead for Labour’s continued and enthusiastic betrayal of
its founding principles. Like Blair and Obama before him, Starmer embodies the
evils of rule by lawyers and of Jewish control. And always remember that the
rule of lawyers is not at all the same thing as the rule of law. In some ways
it’s the complete opposite. In America, the legalized crucifixion of VDare and
the legalized persecution of Donald Trump are proof of that.

Proud Black female lawyers are wielding arbitrary and unaccountable legal power
without any regard for genuine law. If a lawyer is the larval stage of a
politician, then the rule of lawyers is plainly the prelude to leftist tyranny.